◆
Each company kept apart
Subsidiaries run in separated estates with their own access and data. Shared services sit alongside without blurring the boundaries.
Holding companies and corporate groups inherit infrastructure with every acquisition: different clouds, different contracts, different ways of keeping records. Bringing it together is usually a project nobody has time for. Compute gives each subsidiary its own separated estate on one platform, priced under the leading cloud, on one bill the group can read.
Used by family holding companies, private equity platforms and Fortune 500 groups for shared services, consolidation and portfolio estates.
What this looks like in practice
Subsidiaries run in separated estates with their own access and data. Shared services sit alongside without blurring the boundaries.
Spend broken out by company, service and project, so recharges and allocations come from the bill rather than a spreadsheet.
Machines, managed databases, build minutes and support priced 30% under the leading cloud for the same thing, published beside the leading cloud’s figure.
No reservations or minimum terms, so an acquisition or disposal does not leave a commitment behind.
Most groups run as many infrastructure arrangements as they have companies. Each was reasonable when it was chosen. Together they are expensive, hard to see across and harder to govern.
A new company joins the group with its own systems and its own contract. Rather than a year-long integration, it gets an estate on the same platform as everyone else, with its own access and data kept apart. Its spend appears on the group bill from the first day, at a lower price than it was paying the leading cloud.
Finance, HR and procurement tools on CosmoBase and Panel, used across every company that needs them.
Every subsidiary’s repositories on CodeGraph, with review and CI under one set of rules.
Every brand’s domains and DNS registered and managed together.
Business and Enterprise support, monthly, priced under the leading cloud’s support minimums.
Compared with the leading cloud's own published on-demand prices, US East. Every comparison.
Yes. Separation between estates is a configured property of the platform, not a convention. Shared services can be granted access deliberately where they need it.
Usage is itemised by service and project, so allocations and recharges can be taken directly from the bill.
There are no reservations or minimum terms to unwind. Its estate can be handed over or closed without leaving a commitment behind.
Yes. A holding company with two businesses pays only for what it uses; the same arrangement carries groups with many more.
Run agents, the tools they call and the models behind them on one platform, billed by the token and the second, for less than the same work costs on the leading cloud.
Host the landing pages, attribution pipelines and onboarding flows that bring customers in, and spend less on the infrastructure than you would on the leading cloud.
Run campaign sites, personalisation, content pipelines and marketing data on one platform that costs less than the leading cloud for the same machines and models.
Run the forms, enrichment jobs, scoring models and routing that turn interest into leads, for less than the same infrastructure costs on the leading cloud.
Run CRMs, sales data, call analysis and AI assistants on one platform, priced under the leading cloud for the same machines, databases and models.
Host creator platforms, media processing, storefronts and AI tools on infrastructure that bills by the second and costs less than the leading cloud for the same machines.
Begin with one workload. Keep what you have running. Decide whether to continue once you have seen it carry something real.
No migration required to begin. Nothing to tear down if you stop.